Skip to content

Stephen Halliday vs Cole Sillinger

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Stephen Halliday is ahead on 6 of 10 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Stephen Halliday sits in the 79th percentile, Cole Sillinger the 21st.

MeasureHallidaySillinger
Scoring · NHL
Points11
Goals11
Assists00
Ice time per game10:0814:21
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.2883 pct0.4595 pct
Shot attempts per game2.357 pct4.089 pct
Goals above expected+0.267 pct+0.166 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share54.2%59 pct53.4%56 pct
Chances for per 604.4198 pct3.1882 pct
Chances against per 603.727 pct2.7828 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.3879 pct−0.1321 pct
Creates per 60+0.5092 pct+0.0140 pct
Prevents per 60−0.1222 pct−0.1419 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →