Skip to content

Juraj Slafkovský vs Bokondji Imama

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Juraj Slafkovský is ahead on 8 of 12 measures. The widest gap is prevents per 60: Bokondji Imama sits in the 97th percentile, Juraj Slafkovský the 7th.

MeasureSlafkovskýImama
Scoring · NHL
Points10
Goals10
Assists00
Ice time per game18:366:21
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1558 pct0.016 pct
Shot attempts per game2.357 pct0.32 pct
Goals above expected+0.579 pct0.057 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share34.6%14 pct72.0%96 pct
Chances for per 601.7324 pct0.892 pct
Chances against per 603.2614 pct0.3599 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.1024 pct+0.2667 pct
Creates per 60+0.1662 pct−0.1221 pct
Prevents per 60−0.267 pct+0.3897 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →