Skip to content

Jiri Kulich vs Gabriel Landeskog

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Gabriel Landeskog is ahead on 7 of 10 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Gabriel Landeskog sits in the 91st percentile, Jiri Kulich the 29th.

MeasureKulichLandeskog
Scoring · NHL
Points22
Goals11
Assists11
Ice time per game12:0416:14
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.2477 pct0.0318 pct
Shot attempts per game2.047 pct0.55 pct
Goals above expected+0.370 pct+0.993 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share57.2%67 pct58.7%71 pct
Chances for per 601.8631 pct3.3789 pct
Chances against per 601.3989 pct2.3745 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.0629 pct+0.5991 pct
Creates per 60−0.0825 pct+0.2977 pct
Prevents per 60+0.0247 pct+0.3194 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →