Skip to content

Marco Kasper vs Frederic Brunet

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Marco Kasper is ahead on 5 of 7 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Marco Kasper sits in the 87th percentile, Frederic Brunet the 34th.

MeasureKasperBrunet
Scoring · NHL
Points00
Goals00
Assists00
Ice time per game10:5018:43
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1967 pct0.0316 pct
Shot attempts per game4.088 pct2.047 pct
Goals above expected−0.236 pct0.060 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.4987 pct−0.0234 pct
Creates per 60+0.3281 pct−0.0136 pct
Prevents per 60+0.1882 pct−0.0140 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →