Skip to content

Marco Kasper vs Jeremy Lauzon

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Marco Kasper is ahead on 5 of 7 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Marco Kasper sits in the 86th percentile, Jeremy Lauzon the 14th.

MeasureKasperLauzon
Scoring · NHL
Points00
Goals00
Assists00
Ice time per game10:5016:30
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1966 pct0.0422 pct
Shot attempts per game4.088 pct2.357 pct
Goals above expected−0.238 pct−0.145 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share—68.0%92 pct
Chances for per 60—3.5591 pct
Chances against per 60—1.6779 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.4986 pct−0.2314 pct
Creates per 60+0.3282 pct−0.2310 pct
Prevents per 60+0.1781 pct0.0042 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 537 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →