Skip to content

Arber Xhekaj vs Scott Laughton

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Scott Laughton is ahead on 7 of 10 measures. The widest gap is chances for per 60: Scott Laughton sits in the 84th percentile, Arber Xhekaj the 12th.

MeasureXhekajLaughton
Scoring · NHL
Points00
Goals00
Assists00
Ice time per game13:0214:19
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.001 pct0.1969 pct
Shot attempts per game0.01 pct2.560 pct
Goals above expected0.067 pct−0.419 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share35.6%16 pct46.7%40 pct
Chances for per 601.2812 pct3.2884 pct
Chances against per 602.3148 pct3.748 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.2712 pct−0.0925 pct
Creates per 60−0.305 pct−0.0332 pct
Prevents per 60+0.0350 pct−0.0631 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →