Skip to content

Emil Lilleberg vs Andrew Copp

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Andrew Copp is ahead on 8 of 9 measures. The widest gap is shot attempts per game: Andrew Copp sits in the 66th percentile, Emil Lilleberg the 15th.

MeasureLillebergCopp
Scoring · NHL
Points01
Goals00
Assists01
Ice time per game10:3021:28
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0736 pct0.1456 pct
Shot attempts per game1.015 pct2.766 pct
Goals above expected−0.152 pct−0.418 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share—52.1%52 pct
Chances for per 60—2.1745 pct
Chances against per 60—2.0063 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.349 pct+0.0442 pct
Creates per 60−0.383 pct−0.0726 pct
Prevents per 60+0.0350 pct+0.1168 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →