Skip to content

Carter Mazur vs Chris Kreider

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Chris Kreider is ahead on 10 of 10 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Chris Kreider sits in the 79th percentile, Carter Mazur the 3rd.

MeasureMazurKreider
Scoring · NHL
Points14
Goals01
Assists13
Ice time per game7:2514:36
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.2578 pct0.2579 pct
Shot attempts per game1.015 pct2.357 pct
Goals above expected−0.331 pct+0.269 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share—32.8%11 pct
Chances for per 60—1.8832 pct
Chances against per 60—3.855 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.473 pct+0.3779 pct
Creates per 60−0.0137 pct+0.3180 pct
Prevents per 60−0.471 pct+0.0759 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →