Skip to content

Matt Coronato vs Blake Coleman

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Blake Coleman is ahead on 8 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Blake Coleman sits in the 86th percentile, Matt Coronato the 40th.

MeasureCoronatoColeman
Scoring · NHL
Points12
Goals11
Assists01
Ice time per game17:2815:01
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1354 pct0.1967 pct
Shot attempts per game4.392 pct2.358 pct
Goals above expected+0.681 pct+0.475 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share46.4%37 pct47.0%39 pct
Chances for per 602.3953 pct2.3852 pct
Chances against per 602.7630 pct2.6834 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.0340 pct+0.4986 pct
Creates per 60+0.2675 pct+0.4489 pct
Prevents per 60−0.2310 pct+0.0554 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 555 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →