Skip to content

William Eklund vs Tony DeAngelo

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

William Eklund is ahead on 8 of 10 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: William Eklund sits in the 80th percentile, Tony DeAngelo the 3rd.

MeasureEklundDeAngelo
Scoring · NHL
Points00
Goals00
Assists00
Ice time per game17:0517:29
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.9899 pct0.0632 pct
Shot attempts per game5.093 pct2.560 pct
Goals above expected−2.01 pct−0.143 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share68.6%90 pct51.2%49 pct
Chances for per 605.4099 pct3.3085 pct
Chances against per 602.4841 pct3.1519 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.3980 pct−0.483 pct
Creates per 60+0.3180 pct−0.0333 pct
Prevents per 60+0.0862 pct−0.461 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →