Skip to content

Josh Doan vs Cole Sillinger

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Josh Doan and Cole Sillinger split the measures 6 each. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Josh Doan sits in the 95th percentile, Cole Sillinger the 20th.

MeasureDoanSillinger
Scoring · NHL
Points01
Goals01
Assists00
Ice time per game18:3614:21
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1763 pct0.4595 pct
Shot attempts per game3.072 pct4.087 pct
Goals above expected−0.321 pct+0.171 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share61.2%76 pct53.4%54 pct
Chances for per 602.7666 pct3.1882 pct
Chances against per 601.7573 pct2.7828 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.7295 pct−0.1420 pct
Creates per 60+0.5193 pct+0.0139 pct
Prevents per 60+0.2186 pct−0.1518 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →