Skip to content

Shakir Mukhamadullin vs Justin Hryckowian

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Justin Hryckowian is ahead on 7 of 10 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Justin Hryckowian sits in the 54th percentile, Shakir Mukhamadullin the 4th.

MeasureMukhamadullinHryckowian
Scoring · NHL
Points00
Goals00
Assists00
Ice time per game11:3215:59
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.015 pct0.0630 pct
Shot attempts per game0.56 pct1.015 pct
Goals above expected0.061 pct−0.239 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share45.5%35 pct42.0%28 pct
Chances for per 601.9435 pct2.0038 pct
Chances against per 602.3248 pct2.7729 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.444 pct+0.1354 pct
Creates per 60−0.412 pct−0.0137 pct
Prevents per 60−0.0335 pct+0.1474 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 537 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →