Skip to content

Mavrik Bourque vs Luca Cagnoni

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Luca Cagnoni is ahead on 7 of 13 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Mavrik Bourque sits in the 60th percentile, Luca Cagnoni the 4th.

MeasureBourqueCagnoni
Scoring · NHL
Points02
Goals01
Assists01
Ice time per game17:4521:19
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1558 pct0.2475 pct
Shot attempts per game3.071 pct4.087 pct
Goals above expected−0.325 pct+0.580 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share33.1%12 pct24.6%5 pct
Chances for per 601.106 pct0.893 pct
Chances against per 602.2252 pct2.7430 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.1960 pct−0.454 pct
Creates per 60+0.1152 pct−0.334 pct
Prevents per 60+0.0863 pct−0.1220 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 532 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →