Skip to content

Tyler Kleven vs Gabriel Landeskog

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Gabriel Landeskog is ahead on 10 of 13 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Gabriel Landeskog sits in the 91st percentile, Tyler Kleven the 2nd.

MeasureKlevenLandeskog
Scoring · NHL
Points02
Goals01
Assists01
Ice time per game21:2116:14
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.028 pct0.0318 pct
Shot attempts per game1.325 pct0.55 pct
Goals above expected0.057 pct+0.993 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share42.2%28 pct58.7%71 pct
Chances for per 601.6320 pct3.3789 pct
Chances against per 602.2451 pct2.3745 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.542 pct+0.5991 pct
Creates per 60−0.511 pct+0.2977 pct
Prevents per 60−0.0336 pct+0.3194 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →