Skip to content

Ridly Greig vs Mark Stone

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Mark Stone is ahead on 9 of 10 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Mark Stone sits in the 85th percentile, Ridly Greig the 23rd.

MeasureGreigStone
Scoring · NHL
Points14
Goals02
Assists12
Ice time per game13:1018:22
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1560 pct0.2984 pct
Shot attempts per game3.073 pct2.354 pct
Goals above expected−0.241 pct−0.143 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share—51.2%49 pct
Chances for per 60—2.2947 pct
Chances against per 60—2.1855 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.1223 pct+0.4785 pct
Creates per 60−0.0726 pct+0.2168 pct
Prevents per 60−0.0532 pct+0.2690 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 555 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →