Skip to content

Drew O'Connor vs Luca Cagnoni

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Drew O'Connor is ahead on 6 of 10 measures. The widest gap is chances for per 60: Drew O'Connor sits in the 75th percentile, Luca Cagnoni the 5th.

MeasureO'ConnorCagnoni
Scoring · NHL
Points22
Goals11
Assists11
Ice time per game16:2120:33
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.2376 pct0.1660 pct
Shot attempts per game3.073 pct2.766 pct
Goals above expected+0.165 pct+0.578 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share38.2%19 pct29.1%8 pct
Chances for per 602.9575 pct1.135 pct
Chances against per 604.761 pct2.7430 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.0441 pct−0.454 pct
Creates per 60+0.2169 pct−0.325 pct
Prevents per 60−0.1714 pct−0.1320 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →