Skip to content

Joel Kiviranta vs Zach Metsa

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Joel Kiviranta is ahead on 7 of 9 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Joel Kiviranta sits in the 80th percentile, Zach Metsa the 27th.

MeasureKivirantaMetsa
Scoring · NHL
Points11
Goals10
Assists01
Ice time per game10:2810:42
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0942 pct0.001 pct
Shot attempts per game1.531 pct0.01 pct
Goals above expected+0.888 pct0.064 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share—51.1%49 pct
Chances for per 60—2.6961 pct
Chances against per 60—2.5837 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.3980 pct−0.0827 pct
Creates per 60+0.1357 pct−0.1519 pct
Prevents per 60+0.2692 pct+0.0759 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 537 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →