Skip to content

Joel Kiviranta vs Shakir Mukhamadullin

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Joel Kiviranta is ahead on 5 of 7 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Joel Kiviranta sits in the 81st percentile, Shakir Mukhamadullin the 4th.

MeasureKivirantaMukhamadullin
Scoring · NHL
Points00
Goals00
Assists00
Ice time per game10:1811:32
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0527 pct0.017 pct
Shot attempts per game2.046 pct0.57 pct
Goals above expected0.057 pct0.063 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share—45.5%36 pct
Chances for per 60—1.9435 pct
Chances against per 60—2.3247 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.4081 pct−0.444 pct
Creates per 60+0.1356 pct−0.412 pct
Prevents per 60+0.2792 pct−0.0337 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →