Skip to content

Albert Johansson vs Joel Kiviranta

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Joel Kiviranta is ahead on 7 of 9 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Joel Kiviranta sits in the 80th percentile, Albert Johansson the 14th.

MeasureJohanssonKiviranta
Scoring · NHL
Points01
Goals01
Assists00
Ice time per game15:0310:28
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0212 pct0.0944 pct
Shot attempts per game2.560 pct1.532 pct
Goals above expected0.058 pct+0.889 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share38.1%22 pct—
Chances for per 601.095 pct—
Chances against per 601.7673 pct—
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.2314 pct+0.3980 pct
Creates per 60−0.258 pct+0.1356 pct
Prevents per 60+0.0246 pct+0.2691 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →