Skip to content

Jackson LaCombe vs Calum Ritchie

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Jackson LaCombe and Calum Ritchie split the measures 6 each. The widest gap is prevents per 60: Jackson LaCombe sits in the 95th percentile, Calum Ritchie the 25th.

MeasureLaCombeRitchie
Scoring · NHL
Points22
Goals01
Assists21
Ice time per game29:0914:44
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1660 pct0.1865 pct
Shot attempts per game2.047 pct2.766 pct
Goals above expected−0.326 pct+0.576 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share46.2%37 pct50.3%47 pct
Chances for per 601.9737 pct2.5057 pct
Chances against per 602.2949 pct2.4741 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.4584 pct−0.0333 pct
Creates per 60+0.1359 pct+0.0747 pct
Prevents per 60+0.3195 pct−0.1025 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →