Skip to content

Jackson LaCombe vs Mason McTavish

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Mason McTavish is ahead on 7 of 13 measures. The widest gap is prevents per 60: Jackson LaCombe sits in the 95th percentile, Mason McTavish the 3rd.

MeasureLaCombeMcTavish
Scoring · NHL
Points32
Goals02
Assists30
Ice time per game29:1215:38
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1661 pct0.3187 pct
Shot attempts per game2.047 pct4.089 pct
Goals above expected−0.326 pct+1.195 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share46.2%36 pct50.2%47 pct
Chances for per 601.9736 pct1.9535 pct
Chances against per 602.2950 pct1.9366 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.4584 pct−0.1421 pct
Creates per 60+0.1358 pct+0.1966 pct
Prevents per 60+0.3195 pct−0.333 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 550 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →