Jackson LaCombe vs Garnet Hathaway
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Change first player
Ducks skaters
- Beckett Sennecke
- Cutter Gauthier
- Mikael Granlund
- A.J. Greer
- Ryan Poehling
- Leo Carlsson
- Jackson LaCombe
- Alex Killorn
- Tristan Luneau
- Jeff Malott
- Tim Washe
- Travis Mitchell
- Pavel Mintyukov
- Nikita Nesterenko
- Tyson Hinds
- Judd Caulfield
- Sam Colangelo
- Noah Warren
- Frank Vatrano
- Nikita Klepov
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- Kyle Connor
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Alex Tuch
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Cole Perfetti
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Beckett Sennecke
- Clayton Keller
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Cutter Gauthier
Another club (its chance leader)
Change second player
Panthers skaters
- Sam Reinhart
- Carter Verhaeghe
- Brady Tkachuk
- Sandis Vilmanis
- Eetu Luostarinen
- Matthew Tkachuk
- Sam Bennett
- Seth Jones
- Anton Lundell
- Brad Marchand
- Lars Eller
- Niko Mikkola
- Aaron Ekblad
- Garnet Hathaway
- Aleksander Barkov
- Gustav Forsling
- Radko Gudas
- Uvis Balinskis
- Dmitry Kulikov
- Bokondji Imama
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- Kyle Connor
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Alex Tuch
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Cole Perfetti
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Beckett Sennecke
- Clayton Keller
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Cutter Gauthier
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Jackson LaCombe is ahead on 7 of 12 measures. The widest gap is chance share: Garnet Hathaway sits in the 99th percentile, Jackson LaCombe the 17th.
| Measure | LaCombe | Hathaway |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 3 | 0 |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 3 | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 29:12 | 8:16 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.1560 pct | 0.0316 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 2.048 pct | 0.810 pct |
| Goals above expected | −0.517 pct | −0.146 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 37.2%17 pct | 77.6%99 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 1.6922 pct | 1.4514 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 2.8724 pct | 0.4299 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +0.3878 pct | +0.5289 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.1051 pct | −0.0924 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | +0.2892 pct | +0.6199 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 555 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →
