Jackson LaCombe vs Mika Zibanejad
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Ducks · DJackson LaCombeChange first player
Ducks skaters
- Cutter Gauthier
- Beckett Sennecke
- Mikael Granlund
- A.J. Greer
- Ryan Poehling
- Leo Carlsson
- Jackson LaCombe
- Tristan Luneau
- Pavel Mintyukov
- Tyson Hinds
- Jeff Malott
- Alex Killorn
- Tim Washe
- Nikita Nesterenko
- Sam Colangelo
- Noah Warren
- Frank Vatrano
- Judd Caulfield
- Travis Mitchell
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Kyle Connor
- Tomas Hertl
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Clayton Keller
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Sebastian Aho
- Jack Hughes
Another club (its chance leader)
Rangers · CMika ZibanejadChange second player
Rangers skaters
- Will Cuylle
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- J.T. Miller
- Mika Zibanejad
- Gabe Perreault
- Alexis Lafrenière
- Oliver Bjorkstrand
- Eeli Tolvanen
- Tye Kartye
- Adam Fox
- Jaroslav Chmelar
- Sean Durzi
- Noah Laba
- Braden Schneider
- Vladislav Gavrikov
- Alberts Smits
- Marcus Pettersson
- Joseph Veleno
- Matt Rempe
- Cole Beaudoin
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Kyle Connor
- Tomas Hertl
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Clayton Keller
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Sebastian Aho
- Jack Hughes
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Mika Zibanejad is ahead on 9 of 13 measures. The widest gap is prevents per 60: Jackson LaCombe sits in the 95th percentile, Mika Zibanejad the 42nd.
| Measure | LaCombe | Zibanejad |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 2 | 5 |
| Goals | 0 | 1 |
| Assists | 2 | 4 |
| Ice time per game | 29:09 | 20:40 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.1660 pct | 0.2680 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 2.047 pct | 2.664 pct |
| Goals above expected | −0.327 pct | −0.328 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 46.2%38 pct | 57.1%65 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 1.9737 pct | 2.7665 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 2.2950 pct | 2.0860 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +0.4585 pct | −0.0334 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.1357 pct | −0.0333 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | +0.3195 pct | 0.0042 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 537 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →