Skip to content

Jackson LaCombe vs Joel Edmundson

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Jackson LaCombe is ahead on 7 of 11 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Jackson LaCombe sits in the 78th percentile, Joel Edmundson the 3rd.

MeasureLaCombeEdmundson
Scoring · NHL
Points30
Goals00
Assists30
Ice time per game29:1214:03
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1560 pct0.0629 pct
Shot attempts per game2.048 pct2.048 pct
Goals above expected−0.517 pct−0.239 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share37.2%17 pct66.1%89 pct
Chances for per 601.6922 pct2.4153 pct
Chances against per 602.8724 pct1.2393 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.3878 pct−0.463 pct
Creates per 60+0.1051 pct−0.461 pct
Prevents per 60+0.2892 pct0.0042 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 555 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →