Connor McMichael vs Andrew Copp
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Change first player
Blues skaters
- Mason McTavish
- Dalibor Dvorsky
- Adam Jiricek
- Jonatan Berggren
- Dylan Holloway
- Pavel Buchnevich
- Jake Neighbours
- Philip Broberg
- Jimmy Snuggerud
- Connor McMichael
- Colton Parayko
- Robert Thomas
- Pius Suter
- Cam Fowler
- Brandon Carlo
- Theo Lindstein
- Ross Johnston
- Dillon Dube
- Alexey Toropchenko
- Zach Dean
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Kyle Connor
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Nick Schmaltz
- Brandon Hagel
- Morgan Geekie
- Will Smith
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Tyson Foerster
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Gabriel Vilardi
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- David Pastrnak
Another club (its chance leader)
Change second player
Red Wings skaters
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Emmitt Finnie
- Viktor Arvidsson
- Alex DeBrincat
- Lucas Raymond
- Moritz Seider
- Justin Faulk
- Michael Rasmussen
- Andrew Copp
- Marco Kasper
- Axel Sandin-Pellikka
- J.T. Compher
- Nate Danielson
- Anton Johansson
- Ben Chiarot
- Albert Johansson
- Mason Appleton
- Andreas Englund
- Keegan Kolesar
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Kyle Connor
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Nick Schmaltz
- Brandon Hagel
- Morgan Geekie
- Will Smith
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Tyson Foerster
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Gabriel Vilardi
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- David Pastrnak
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Connor McMichael and Andrew Copp split the measures 3 each. The widest gap is prevents per 60: Andrew Copp sits in the 63rd percentile, Connor McMichael the 10th.
| Measure | McMichael | Copp |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 1 | 1 |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 1 | 1 |
| Ice time per game | 14:11 | 23:01 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.1046 pct | 0.1045 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 2.560 pct | 2.560 pct |
| Goals above expected | −0.234 pct | −0.235 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | — | 50.6%47 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | — | 2.6360 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | — | 2.5637 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +0.0339 pct | +0.0239 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.2370 pct | −0.0627 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | −0.2110 pct | +0.0863 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →
