Skip to content

Jack Hughes vs Scott Laughton

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Jack Hughes is ahead on 12 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Jack Hughes sits in the 96th percentile, Scott Laughton the 25th.

MeasureHughesLaughton
Scoring · NHL
Points10
Goals10
Assists00
Ice time per game23:2514:19
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.5297 pct0.1968 pct
Shot attempts per game6.096 pct2.560 pct
Goals above expected0.058 pct−0.419 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share69.7%92 pct46.7%41 pct
Chances for per 603.9695 pct3.2885 pct
Chances against per 601.7275 pct3.748 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.7596 pct−0.0925 pct
Creates per 60+0.6797 pct−0.0333 pct
Prevents per 60+0.0863 pct−0.0632 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →