Skip to content

Pontus Holmberg vs Florian Xhekaj

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Pontus Holmberg is ahead on 10 of 10 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Pontus Holmberg sits in the 91st percentile, Florian Xhekaj the 16th.

MeasureHolmbergXhekaj
Scoring · NHL
Points20
Goals10
Assists10
Ice time per game14:308:48
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.2477 pct0.0735 pct
Shot attempts per game2.357 pct1.015 pct
Goals above expected+0.370 pct−0.152 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share50.7%48 pct—
Chances for per 602.9074 pct—
Chances against per 602.8226 pct—
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.5791 pct−0.2216 pct
Creates per 60+0.2372 pct−0.452 pct
Prevents per 60+0.3496 pct+0.2489 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →