Skip to content

Filip Hallander vs Tony DeAngelo

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Filip Hallander is ahead on 7 of 9 measures. The widest gap is expected goals per game: Filip Hallander sits in the 92nd percentile, Tony DeAngelo the 32nd.

MeasureHallanderDeAngelo
Scoring · NHL
Points30
Goals10
Assists20
Ice time per game10:1717:29
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.3892 pct0.0632 pct
Shot attempts per game2.560 pct2.560 pct
Goals above expected+0.273 pct−0.144 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share—51.2%49 pct
Chances for per 60—3.3086 pct
Chances against per 60—3.1519 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.2910 pct−0.483 pct
Creates per 60−0.0430 pct−0.0334 pct
Prevents per 60−0.247 pct−0.461 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →