Skip to content

Joel Farabee vs Mackie Samoskevich

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Joel Farabee and Mackie Samoskevich split the measures 6 each. The widest gap is goals above expected: Mackie Samoskevich sits in the 95th percentile, Joel Farabee the 13th.

MeasureFarabeeSamoskevich
Scoring · NHL
Points22
Goals02
Assists20
Ice time per game16:1214:51
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1968 pct0.2679 pct
Shot attempts per game3.380 pct2.766 pct
Goals above expected−0.613 pct+1.295 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share58.5%70 pct46.4%37 pct
Chances for per 603.3889 pct1.8329 pct
Chances against per 602.4046 pct2.1258 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.2263 pct+0.4886 pct
Creates per 60+0.3383 pct+0.3078 pct
Prevents per 60−0.1123 pct+0.1881 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 555 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →