Skip to content

Joel Farabee vs Jackson LaCombe

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Joel Farabee and Jackson LaCombe split the measures 5 each. The widest gap is prevents per 60: Jackson LaCombe sits in the 94th percentile, Joel Farabee the 22nd.

MeasureFarabeeLaCombe
Scoring · NHL
Points22
Goals00
Assists22
Ice time per game16:1229:09
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1968 pct0.1661 pct
Shot attempts per game3.376 pct2.046 pct
Goals above expected−0.611 pct−0.323 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share58.5%68 pct46.2%38 pct
Chances for per 603.3887 pct1.9737 pct
Chances against per 602.4044 pct2.2949 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.2264 pct+0.4584 pct
Creates per 60+0.3383 pct+0.1358 pct
Prevents per 60−0.1122 pct+0.3194 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →