Skip to content

Neal Pionk vs Jesper Bratt

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Jesper Bratt is ahead on 9 of 11 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Jesper Bratt sits in the 95th percentile, Neal Pionk the 15th.

MeasurePionkBratt
Scoring · NHL
Points02
Goals00
Assists02
Ice time per game22:5118:43
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0733 pct0.2884 pct
Shot attempts per game3.785 pct3.785 pct
Goals above expected−0.236 pct−0.97 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share35.5%14 pct62.6%81 pct
Chances for per 601.9134 pct3.8295 pct
Chances against per 603.4610 pct2.2849 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.2215 pct+0.7195 pct
Creates per 60−0.1518 pct+0.7098 pct
Prevents per 60−0.0729 pct+0.0144 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →