Skip to content

Timothy Liljegren vs Matt Coronato

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Timothy Liljegren and Matt Coronato split the measures 6 each. The widest gap is shot attempts per game: Matt Coronato sits in the 92nd percentile, Timothy Liljegren the 25th.

MeasureLiljegrenCoronato
Scoring · NHL
Points01
Goals01
Assists00
Ice time per game17:4117:28
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0211 pct0.1354 pct
Shot attempts per game1.325 pct4.392 pct
Goals above expected−0.155 pct+0.681 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share67.6%92 pct46.4%37 pct
Chances for per 603.7094 pct2.3953 pct
Chances against per 601.7774 pct2.7630 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.0846 pct+0.0340 pct
Creates per 60+0.0849 pct+0.2675 pct
Prevents per 600.0042 pct−0.2310 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 555 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →