Nico Hischier vs Mark Stone
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Change first player
Devils skaters
- Jack Hughes
- Luke Evangelista
- Timo Meier
- Nico Hischier
- Jesper Bratt
- Dougie Hamilton
- Dawson Mercer
- Luke Hughes
- Arseny Gritsyuk
- Anthony Mantha
- Cody Glass
- Evan Rodrigues
- Amadeus Lombardi
- Jesper Boqvist
- Declan Chisholm
- Brett Pesce
- Jonas Siegenthaler
- Stefan Noesen
- Brenden Dillon
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Kyle Connor
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Clayton Keller
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Sebastian Aho
Another club (its chance leader)
Change second player
Golden Knights skaters
- Tomas Hertl
- Brett Howden
- William Karlsson
- Victor Olofsson
- Mark Stone
- Mitch Marner
- Jack Eichel
- Trevor Connelly
- Braeden Bowman
- Marc Gatcomb
- Shea Theodore
- Ivan Barbashev
- Noah Hanifin
- Nic Dowd
- Rasmus Andersson
- Brayden McNabb
- Jeremy Lauzon
- Parker Wotherspoon
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Kyle Connor
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Clayton Keller
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Sebastian Aho
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Mark Stone is ahead on 7 of 13 measures. The widest gap is chances for per 60: Nico Hischier sits in the 94th percentile, Mark Stone the 48th.
| Measure | Hischier | Stone |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 0 | 4 |
| Goals | 0 | 2 |
| Assists | 0 | 2 |
| Ice time per game | 20:28 | 18:22 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.3085 pct | 0.2984 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 2.047 pct | 2.353 pct |
| Goals above expected | −0.96 pct | −0.142 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 57.9%69 pct | 51.2%49 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 3.7594 pct | 2.2948 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 2.7231 pct | 2.1855 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +0.5991 pct | +0.4785 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.5193 pct | +0.2169 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | +0.0862 pct | +0.2691 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →
