Mario Ferraro vs Tim Stützle
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Change first player
Jets skaters
- Kyle Connor
- Cole Perfetti
- Gabriel Vilardi
- Josh Morrissey
- Mark Scheifele
- Viggo Björck
- Vladislav Namestnikov
- Morgan Barron
- Brad Lambert
- Adam Lowry
- Neal Pionk
- Alex Iafallo
- Mario Ferraro
- Isak Rosen
- Dylan Samberg
- Dylan DeMelo
- Tyrel Bauer
- Nino Niederreiter
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Kyle Connor
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Jordan Eberle
- William Eklund
- Nick Schmaltz
- Cole Perfetti
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Will Smith
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Sebastian Aho
- Marco Rossi
- Kirill Kaprizov
- JJ Peterka
- Artemi Panarin
- Sam Reinhart
Another club (its chance leader)
Change second player
Senators skaters
- William Eklund
- Stephen Halliday
- Michael Amadio
- Drake Batherson
- Shane Pinto
- Tim Stützle
- Thomas Chabot
- Dylan Cozens
- Claude Giroux
- Hayden Hodgson
- Jordan Spence
- Carter Yakemchuk
- Fabian Zetterlund
- Nikolas Matinpalo
- Tyler Kleven
- Nick Cousins
- Warren Foegele
- Jake Sanderson
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Kyle Connor
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Jordan Eberle
- William Eklund
- Nick Schmaltz
- Cole Perfetti
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Will Smith
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Sebastian Aho
- Marco Rossi
- Kirill Kaprizov
- JJ Peterka
- Artemi Panarin
- Sam Reinhart
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Tim Stützle is ahead on 6 of 9 measures. The widest gap is goals above expected: Mario Ferraro sits in the 93rd percentile, Tim Stützle the 32nd.
| Measure | Ferraro | Stützle |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 1 | 1 |
| Goals | 1 | 0 |
| Assists | 0 | 1 |
| Ice time per game | 19:08 | 22:51 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.0424 pct | 0.2273 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 1.533 pct | 3.072 pct |
| Goals above expected | +0.993 pct | −0.232 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 13.3%1 pct | — |
| Chances for per 60 | 0.511 pct | — |
| Chances against per 60 | 3.3115 pct | — |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | −0.2016 pct | +0.0848 pct |
| Creates per 60 | −0.1023 pct | +0.3079 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | −0.1025 pct | −0.228 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →
