Jesper Bratt vs Lawson Crouse
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Change first player
Devils skaters
- Jack Hughes
- Luke Evangelista
- Timo Meier
- Nico Hischier
- Jesper Bratt
- Dougie Hamilton
- Dawson Mercer
- Luke Hughes
- Arseny Gritsyuk
- Anthony Mantha
- Cody Glass
- Evan Rodrigues
- Amadeus Lombardi
- Jesper Boqvist
- Declan Chisholm
- Brett Pesce
- Jonas Siegenthaler
- Stefan Noesen
- Brenden Dillon
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- Kyle Connor
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Alex Tuch
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Cole Perfetti
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Beckett Sennecke
- Clayton Keller
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Cutter Gauthier
Another club (its chance leader)
Change second player
Mammoth skaters
- Dylan Guenther
- Nick Schmaltz
- Clayton Keller
- Lawson Crouse
- Anders Lee
- Michael Carcone
- Logan Cooley
- Barrett Hayton
- Jack McBain
- Vincent Trocheck
- Daniil But
- MacKenzie Weegar
- Nate Schmidt
- Mikhail Sergachev
- Andrew Peeke
- Dmitri Simashev
- Kevin Stenlund
- John Marino
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- Kyle Connor
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Alex Tuch
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Cole Perfetti
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Beckett Sennecke
- Clayton Keller
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Cutter Gauthier
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Jesper Bratt is ahead on 8 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Jesper Bratt sits in the 95th percentile, Lawson Crouse the 67th.
| Measure | Bratt | Crouse |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 2 | 2 |
| Goals | 0 | 1 |
| Assists | 2 | 1 |
| Ice time per game | 18:43 | 14:56 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.2884 pct | 0.3389 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 3.786 pct | 2.869 pct |
| Goals above expected | −0.97 pct | −0.325 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 62.6%81 pct | 59.8%73 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 3.8296 pct | 3.3488 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 2.2850 pct | 2.2452 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +0.7195 pct | +0.2667 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.7098 pct | +0.2675 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | +0.0144 pct | 0.0043 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 555 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →
