Clayton Keller vs Radek Faksa
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Mammoth · RClayton KellerChange first player
Mammoth skaters
- Dylan Guenther
- Nick Schmaltz
- Clayton Keller
- Lawson Crouse
- Anders Lee
- Michael Carcone
- Logan Cooley
- Barrett Hayton
- Jack McBain
- Vincent Trocheck
- Daniil But
- MacKenzie Weegar
- Nate Schmidt
- Mikhail Sergachev
- Andrew Peeke
- Dmitri Simashev
- Kevin Stenlund
- John Marino
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Kyle Connor
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Clayton Keller
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Sebastian Aho
Another club (its chance leader)
Stars · CRadek FaksaChange second player
Stars skaters
- Wyatt Johnston
- Roope Hintz
- Jason Robertson
- Tyler Seguin
- Mikko Rantanen
- Jamie Benn
- Miro Heiskanen
- Arttu Hyry
- Sam Steel
- Thomas Harley
- Radek Faksa
- Joel Kiviranta
- Justin Hryckowian
- Oskar Bäck
- Nils Lundkvist
- Esa Lindell
- Tyler Myers
- Lian Bichsel
- Colin Blackwell
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Kyle Connor
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Sebastian Aho
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Clayton Keller is ahead on 11 of 13 measures. The widest gap is creates per 60: Clayton Keller sits in the 97th percentile, Radek Faksa the 7th.
| Measure | Keller | Faksa |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 7 | 1 |
| Goals | 1 | 0 |
| Assists | 6 | 1 |
| Ice time per game | 17:47 | 11:22 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.4495 pct | 0.0941 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 4.391 pct | 1.736 pct |
| Goals above expected | −0.88 pct | −0.330 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 62.1%80 pct | 40.5%24 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 2.9374 pct | 1.5918 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 1.7972 pct | 2.3447 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +0.7697 pct | −0.0530 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.6097 pct | −0.287 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | +0.1679 pct | +0.2388 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →