Clayton Keller vs J.T. Miller
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Change first player
Mammoth skaters
- Nick Schmaltz
- Dylan Guenther
- Clayton Keller
- Anders Lee
- Michael Carcone
- Lawson Crouse
- Logan Cooley
- Barrett Hayton
- Jack McBain
- Daniil But
- Vincent Trocheck
- Mikhail Sergachev
- Andrew Peeke
- MacKenzie Weegar
- Nate Schmidt
- Dmitri Simashev
- John Marino
- Kevin Stenlund
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Kyle Connor
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Jordan Eberle
- William Eklund
- Nick Schmaltz
- Brandon Hagel
- Cole Perfetti
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Tyson Foerster
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Will Smith
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Sebastian Aho
- Marco Rossi
- Kirill Kaprizov
- JJ Peterka
Another club (its chance leader)
Change second player
Rangers skaters
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Alexis Lafrenière
- Will Cuylle
- Mika Zibanejad
- J.T. Miller
- Gabe Perreault
- Eeli Tolvanen
- Oliver Bjorkstrand
- Tye Kartye
- Jaroslav Chmelar
- Adam Fox
- Sean Durzi
- Noah Laba
- Braden Schneider
- Joseph Veleno
- Marcus Pettersson
- Vladislav Gavrikov
- Matt Rempe
- Alberts Smits
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Kyle Connor
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Jordan Eberle
- William Eklund
- Nick Schmaltz
- Brandon Hagel
- Cole Perfetti
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Tyson Foerster
- William Nylander
- Will Smith
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Sebastian Aho
- Marco Rossi
- Kirill Kaprizov
- JJ Peterka
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Clayton Keller is ahead on 10 of 13 measures. The widest gap is goals above expected: J.T. Miller sits in the 70th percentile, Clayton Keller the 1st.
| Measure | Keller | Miller |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 5 | 1 |
| Goals | 0 | 1 |
| Assists | 5 | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 17:37 | 17:25 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.4495 pct | 0.2374 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 4.087 pct | 2.046 pct |
| Goals above expected | −1.31 pct | +0.170 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 61.7%77 pct | 61.4%76 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 3.0176 pct | 3.6793 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 1.8767 pct | 2.3048 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +0.7496 pct | +0.6091 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.6196 pct | +0.4891 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | +0.1375 pct | +0.1272 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 518 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →
