Adam Fox vs Nate Danielson
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Rangers · DAdam FoxChange first player
Rangers skaters
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Alexis Lafrenière
- Will Cuylle
- Mika Zibanejad
- J.T. Miller
- Gabe Perreault
- Eeli Tolvanen
- Oliver Bjorkstrand
- Tye Kartye
- Jaroslav Chmelar
- Adam Fox
- Sean Durzi
- Noah Laba
- Braden Schneider
- Joseph Veleno
- Marcus Pettersson
- Vladislav Gavrikov
- Matt Rempe
- Alberts Smits
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Kyle Connor
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Nick Schmaltz
- Brandon Hagel
- Morgan Geekie
- Will Smith
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Tyson Foerster
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Gabriel Vilardi
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- David Pastrnak
Another club (its chance leader)
Red Wings · CNate DanielsonChange second player
Red Wings skaters
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Emmitt Finnie
- Viktor Arvidsson
- Alex DeBrincat
- Lucas Raymond
- Moritz Seider
- Justin Faulk
- Michael Rasmussen
- Andrew Copp
- Marco Kasper
- Axel Sandin-Pellikka
- J.T. Compher
- Nate Danielson
- Anton Johansson
- Ben Chiarot
- Albert Johansson
- Mason Appleton
- Andreas Englund
- Keegan Kolesar
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Kyle Connor
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Nick Schmaltz
- Brandon Hagel
- Morgan Geekie
- Will Smith
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Tyson Foerster
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Gabriel Vilardi
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- David Pastrnak
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Adam Fox is ahead on 8 of 9 measures. The widest gap is prevents per 60: Adam Fox sits in the 96th percentile, Nate Danielson the 2nd.
| Measure | Fox | Danielson |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 4 | 0 |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 4 | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 20:29 | 8:55 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.1045 pct | 0.0526 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 1.323 pct | 1.017 pct |
| Goals above expected | −0.420 pct | −0.148 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 59.2%69 pct | — |
| Chances for per 60 | 3.0577 pct | — |
| Chances against per 60 | 2.1057 pct | — |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +1.0299 pct | −0.348 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.6898 pct | +0.0443 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | +0.3496 pct | −0.382 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →