Skip to content

Mason Appleton vs Mark Jankowski

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Mark Jankowski is ahead on 6 of 7 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Mark Jankowski sits in the 95th percentile, Mason Appleton the 13th.

MeasureAppletonJankowski
Scoring · NHL
Points00
Goals00
Assists00
Ice time per game9:5112:36
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.015 pct0.0421 pct
Shot attempts per game0.57 pct0.710 pct
Goals above expected0.063 pct−0.145 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share—31.4%11 pct
Chances for per 60—1.7927 pct
Chances against per 60—3.916 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.2513 pct+0.7195 pct
Creates per 60−0.1319 pct+0.2674 pct
Prevents per 60−0.1221 pct+0.4598 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →