Skip to content

John Marino vs Bokondji Imama

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

John Marino is ahead on 6 of 9 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Bokondji Imama sits in the 66th percentile, John Marino the 41st.

MeasureMarinoImama
Scoring · NHL
Points10
Goals00
Assists10
Ice time per game20:326:21
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0211 pct0.001 pct
Shot attempts per game1.015 pct0.01 pct
Goals above expected−0.150 pct0.064 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share53.7%57 pct—
Chances for per 602.3449 pct—
Chances against per 602.0263 pct—
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.0441 pct+0.2566 pct
Creates per 60−0.1122 pct−0.1220 pct
Prevents per 60+0.1476 pct+0.3698 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 537 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →