John Marino vs Josh Manson
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Mammoth · DJohn MarinoChange first player
Mammoth skaters
- Dylan Guenther
- Nick Schmaltz
- Clayton Keller
- Lawson Crouse
- Anders Lee
- Michael Carcone
- Logan Cooley
- Barrett Hayton
- Jack McBain
- Vincent Trocheck
- Daniil But
- MacKenzie Weegar
- Nate Schmidt
- Mikhail Sergachev
- Andrew Peeke
- Dmitri Simashev
- Kevin Stenlund
- John Marino
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Kyle Connor
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Clayton Keller
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Sebastian Aho
Another club (its chance leader)
Avalanche · DJosh MansonChange second player
Avalanche skaters
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Martin Necas
- Artturi Lehkonen
- Nicolas Roy
- Jaden Schwartz
- Cale Makar
- Nazem Kadri
- T.J. Hughes
- Fedor Svechkov
- Sam Malinski
- Brock Nelson
- Parker Kelly
- Brent Burns
- Gabriel Landeskog
- Josh Manson
- Noah Juulsen
- Devon Toews
- Brett Kulak
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Kyle Connor
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Clayton Keller
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Sebastian Aho
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Josh Manson is ahead on 10 of 13 measures. The widest gap is chances for per 60: Josh Manson sits in the 99th percentile, John Marino the 49th.
| Measure | Marino | Manson |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 1 | 3 |
| Goals | 0 | 1 |
| Assists | 1 | 2 |
| Ice time per game | 20:32 | 15:34 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.0211 pct | 0.0315 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 1.015 pct | 1.531 pct |
| Goals above expected | −0.150 pct | +0.994 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 53.7%57 pct | 67.8%91 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 2.3449 pct | 5.2799 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 2.0262 pct | 2.5039 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +0.0441 pct | +0.1151 pct |
| Creates per 60 | −0.1122 pct | 0.0037 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | +0.1476 pct | +0.1168 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →