Skip to content

Joel Eriksson Ek vs Matthew Wood

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Joel Eriksson Ek is ahead on 9 of 12 measures. The widest gap is prevents per 60: Joel Eriksson Ek sits in the 78th percentile, Matthew Wood the 8th.

MeasureEkWood
Scoring · NHL
Points10
Goals00
Assists10
Ice time per game19:0416:44
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1968 pct0.2882 pct
Shot attempts per game3.579 pct4.087 pct
Goals above expected−0.419 pct−0.611 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share58.0%67 pct57.8%67 pct
Chances for per 603.1881 pct2.4255 pct
Chances against per 602.3049 pct1.7673 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.2768 pct−0.1420 pct
Creates per 60+0.1356 pct+0.0950 pct
Prevents per 60+0.1478 pct−0.238 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →