Skip to content

Zach Werenski vs Alex Formenton

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Zach Werenski is ahead on 9 of 10 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Zach Werenski sits in the 95th percentile, Alex Formenton the 25th.

MeasureWerenskiFormenton
Scoring · NHL
Points22
Goals00
Assists22
Ice time per game30:1515:09
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0941 pct0.1352 pct
Shot attempts per game2.562 pct1.737 pct
Goals above expected−0.238 pct−0.420 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share61.5%76 pct39.3%24 pct
Chances for per 602.8568 pct1.5818 pct
Chances against per 601.7972 pct2.4444 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.7095 pct−0.1025 pct
Creates per 60+0.5092 pct−0.0627 pct
Prevents per 60+0.2085 pct−0.0434 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 553 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →