Zach Werenski vs Brent Burns
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Blue Jackets · DZach WerenskiChange first player
Blue Jackets skaters
- Cole Sillinger
- Matthew Knies
- Danton Heinen
- Mathieu Olivier
- Kent Johnson
- Adam Fantilli
- Sean Monahan
- Zach Werenski
- Denton Mateychuk
- Charlie Coyle
- Dmitri Voronkov
- Conor Garland
- Ryan Lomberg
- Valeri Nichushkin
- Carson Soucy
- Jake Christiansen
- Erik Gudbranson
- Emil Andrae
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Kyle Connor
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- William Nylander
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- William Eklund
- Kirill Marchenko
- John Tavares
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Nick Schmaltz
- Brandon Hagel
- Morgan Geekie
- Will Smith
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Tyson Foerster
- Clayton Keller
Another club (its chance leader)
Avalanche · DBrent BurnsChange second player
Avalanche skaters
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Martin Necas
- Artturi Lehkonen
- Nicolas Roy
- Jaden Schwartz
- Cale Makar
- Nazem Kadri
- T.J. Hughes
- Fedor Svechkov
- Sam Malinski
- Brock Nelson
- Parker Kelly
- Brent Burns
- Gabriel Landeskog
- Josh Manson
- Noah Juulsen
- Devon Toews
- Brett Kulak
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Kyle Connor
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- William Nylander
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- William Eklund
- Kirill Marchenko
- John Tavares
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Nick Schmaltz
- Brandon Hagel
- Morgan Geekie
- Will Smith
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Tyson Foerster
- Clayton Keller
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Zach Werenski is ahead on 7 of 12 measures. The widest gap is prevents per 60: Zach Werenski sits in the 84th percentile, Brent Burns the 7th.
| Measure | Werenski | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 2 | 1 |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 2 | 1 |
| Ice time per game | 30:15 | 14:17 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.0940 pct | 0.0633 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 2.561 pct | 3.073 pct |
| Goals above expected | −0.238 pct | −0.143 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 61.5%76 pct | 68.8%91 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 2.8567 pct | 3.8994 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 1.7972 pct | 1.7673 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +0.7094 pct | −0.0134 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.5093 pct | +0.2472 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | +0.2084 pct | −0.257 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 542 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →