Skip to content

Noah Juulsen vs Macklin Celebrini

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Macklin Celebrini is ahead on 11 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Macklin Celebrini sits in the 90th percentile, Noah Juulsen the 2nd.

MeasureJuulsenCelebrini
Scoring · NHL
Points05
Goals00
Assists05
Ice time per game11:0522:20
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0214 pct0.2271 pct
Shot attempts per game1.015 pct5.596 pct
Goals above expected0.057 pct−0.417 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share29.4%8 pct53.3%55 pct
Chances for per 601.4413 pct1.5918 pct
Chances against per 603.4611 pct1.3989 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.552 pct+0.5490 pct
Creates per 60−0.442 pct+0.3079 pct
Prevents per 60−0.1122 pct+0.2489 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →