Skip to content

Tommy Novak vs Mika Zibanejad

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Tommy Novak and Mika Zibanejad split the measures 6 each. The widest gap is creates per 60: Tommy Novak sits in the 97th percentile, Mika Zibanejad the 29th.

MeasureNovakZibanejad
Scoring · NHL
Points43
Goals21
Assists22
Ice time per game15:1920:49
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1968 pct0.2477 pct
Shot attempts per game2.047 pct2.563 pct
Goals above expected+1.497 pct0.066 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share45.9%37 pct57.1%65 pct
Chances for per 602.0239 pct2.6961 pct
Chances against per 602.3847 pct2.0263 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.7094 pct−0.0333 pct
Creates per 60+0.6597 pct−0.0429 pct
Prevents per 60+0.0555 pct+0.0145 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 555 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →