Skip to content

Erik Cernak vs Tom Wilson

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Tom Wilson is ahead on 9 of 13 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Tom Wilson sits in the 93rd percentile, Erik Cernak the 9th.

MeasureCernakWilson
Scoring · NHL
Points04
Goals01
Assists03
Ice time per game19:3618:05
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0735 pct0.1661 pct
Shot attempts per game2.357 pct1.736 pct
Goals above expected−0.234 pct+0.578 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share65.4%87 pct58.6%71 pct
Chances for per 603.0378 pct3.4290 pct
Chances against per 601.6083 pct2.4245 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.339 pct+0.6693 pct
Creates per 60−0.452 pct+0.3685 pct
Prevents per 60+0.1270 pct+0.3093 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 550 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →