Skip to content

Bokondji Imama vs Matthew Wood

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Bokondji Imama and Matthew Wood split the measures 5 each. The widest gap is prevents per 60: Bokondji Imama sits in the 97th percentile, Matthew Wood the 9th.

MeasureImamaWood
Scoring · NHL
Points00
Goals00
Assists00
Ice time per game6:2116:44
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.001 pct0.2881 pct
Shot attempts per game0.01 pct4.088 pct
Goals above expected0.067 pct−0.612 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share66.2%86 pct57.8%66 pct
Chances for per 600.903 pct2.4252 pct
Chances against per 600.4699 pct1.7673 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.2465 pct−0.1421 pct
Creates per 60−0.1220 pct+0.0949 pct
Prevents per 60+0.3697 pct−0.229 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →