Skip to content

Danton Heinen vs Mika Zibanejad

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Mika Zibanejad is ahead on 6 of 10 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Danton Heinen sits in the 73rd percentile, Mika Zibanejad the 34th.

MeasureHeinenZibanejad
Scoring · NHL
Points05
Goals01
Assists04
Ice time per game11:4820:40
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.3084 pct0.2680 pct
Shot attempts per game2.562 pct2.664 pct
Goals above expected−0.612 pct−0.328 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share—57.1%65 pct
Chances for per 60—2.7665 pct
Chances against per 60—2.0860 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.3173 pct−0.0334 pct
Creates per 60+0.1864 pct−0.0333 pct
Prevents per 60+0.1373 pct0.0042 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 537 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →