Michael Amadio vs Chris Tanev
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Senators · RMichael AmadioChange first player
Senators skaters
- William Eklund
- Drake Batherson
- Tim Stützle
- Stephen Halliday
- Michael Amadio
- Shane Pinto
- Dylan Cozens
- Thomas Chabot
- Claude Giroux
- Jordan Spence
- Fabian Zetterlund
- Hayden Hodgson
- Carter Yakemchuk
- Ridly Greig
- Warren Foegele
- Tyler Kleven
- Nikolas Matinpalo
- Nick Cousins
- Cameron Crotty
- Jake Sanderson
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Kyle Connor
- Tomas Hertl
- William Nylander
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Kirill Marchenko
- John Tavares
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Sebastian Aho
- Nick Schmaltz
- Brandon Hagel
- Morgan Geekie
- Will Smith
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Matt Boldy
Another club (its chance leader)
Maple Leafs · DChris TanevChange second player
Maple Leafs skaters
- William Nylander
- Kirill Marchenko
- John Tavares
- Auston Matthews
- Jack Roslovic
- Colton Sissons
- Easton Cowan
- Nick Paul
- Gavin McKenna
- Darren Raddysh
- Morgan Rielly
- Oliver Ekman-Larsson
- Brandon Duhaime
- Teddy Blueger
- Jake McCabe
- Troy Stecher
- Bo Groulx
- Chris Tanev
- Zack MacEwen
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tage Thompson
- William Eklund
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Kyle Connor
- Tomas Hertl
- William Nylander
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Steven Stamkos
- Kirill Marchenko
- John Tavares
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Wyatt Johnston
- Jordan Eberle
- Cole Perfetti
- Auston Matthews
- Sebastian Aho
- Nick Schmaltz
- Brandon Hagel
- Morgan Geekie
- Will Smith
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Matt Boldy
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Michael Amadio is ahead on 9 of 13 measures. The widest gap is expected goals per game: Michael Amadio sits in the 78th percentile, Chris Tanev the 4th.
| Measure | Amadio | Tanev |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 3 | 0 |
| Goals | 2 | 0 |
| Assists | 1 | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 17:29 | 18:51 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.2578 pct | 0.004 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 2.047 pct | 0.32 pct |
| Goals above expected | +1.296 pct | 0.062 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 45.3%35 pct | 38.4%22 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 1.8429 pct | 2.0940 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 2.2253 pct | 3.3515 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +0.2263 pct | +0.2364 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.0139 pct | −0.2112 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | +0.2186 pct | +0.4498 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 553 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →